|
|
Post by broox on Feb 8, 2010 11:15:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lynn on Feb 8, 2010 18:31:00 GMT -5
I love it! I also love how cranky the fashion writer gets at the concept of people wanting to be comfortable instead of fashionable. How dare they!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by professordave on Feb 10, 2010 20:08:26 GMT -5
This seems like a good fashion compromise for women who may not be totally comfortable wearing pajama bottoms to go shopping but like the idea of dressing down once in a while. It's interesting that a women in pajama bottoms, an old t-shirt, and slippers can still get weird looks, but a guy dressed like a retarded hillbilly goes unnoticed.
|
|
|
|
Post by lynn on Feb 10, 2010 21:51:09 GMT -5
Mostly because the movies (And TVAMD) tell us to not disrespect the creepy weirdos. So we pretend not to look, otherwise we might get man-raped.
|
|
|
|
Post by drivebyluna on Feb 11, 2010 0:02:23 GMT -5
That or women are held to a higher standard of beauty than men.
|
|
|
|
Post by lynn on Feb 11, 2010 1:27:17 GMT -5
Yeah, women are expected to make an effort to please men, to catch a husband you see.
bring on the sweaterpants!
|
|
|
|
Post by professordave on Feb 11, 2010 23:22:55 GMT -5
I've heard at various times and from various women that "women dress to please themselves," "women dress to please other women," and "women dress to please men." I would guess that all three are true and that it's mostly situational, based on the occasion. The same holds true for men, we just think about it a whole lot less.
|
|
|
|
Post by lynn on Feb 12, 2010 0:32:25 GMT -5
I think individuals dress for different reasons, but I meant about the cultural context that means bogan women get more glares than bogan men.
Either way really, I love the pyjamajeans and I want them.
|
|
gretl
Robot Monkey
Posts: 121
|
Post by gretl on Oct 16, 2010 12:36:21 GMT -5
Eat your heart out, Brooks:  |
|
|
|
Post by lynn on Oct 16, 2010 21:27:12 GMT -5
if my eyes are not mistaken it looks like a sweater onesy!
|
|
|
|
Post by broox on Oct 18, 2010 10:20:10 GMT -5
Finally! Now we're getting somewhere!  |
|
