|
|
Post by Scary Gary on Dec 4, 2012 19:13:55 GMT -5
My bad, Brooks. I thought you were saying the opposite.
I listened to the Skeptics Guide to the Universe Podcast from this weekend and they rip her a new one. Apparently, this isn't the first time she has played this little trick.
|
|
|
|
Post by broox on Dec 4, 2012 20:51:20 GMT -5
Oh really? What else has she done?
I'm kind of disappointed. I'm not a big foot enthusiast but it would be pretty neat if actual evidence were found.
|
|
|
|
Post by lynn on Dec 5, 2012 1:08:33 GMT -5
I guess it would be cool to find another new species or something, but I actually like it better with no evidence. It's much more open to speculation and craziness without reality intervening.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scary Gary on Dec 5, 2012 21:08:47 GMT -5
They didn't specifically say what she did. They generally said she is the "go to" person for fake DNA tests. I did find the International Science Times discovered that DNA Diagnostics has been given an “F” by the Better Business Bureau. In fact, over a dozen people have complained about the company’s services. lynn's comment - Either we find no "definitive" evidence and the "mystery" lives; or we find evidence and bigfoot becomes just another endangered ape. |
|
|
|
Post by Gilberto on Dec 8, 2012 14:54:49 GMT -5
I wouldn't worry. Bigfoot has become such a business that there are people who will believe or not believe whatever they like regardless of the evidence.
People are always finding these inconclusive hair samples. I think I would like it if someone would say "yeah, that's an unknown species". At least that way the mystery would remain intact but we'd have a little more to go on than fuzzy pictures and footprints.
|
|
