Post by lynn on May 11, 2010 18:59:12 GMT -5
I spent most of yesterday watching the first three Saw movies, just because I was curious, and I must say I was surprised. The first surprise was the lack of gore in the first movie. People were touting it as torture porn from the beginning but it was really more of a thriller because they didn't focus on the gore. Of course by the third movie it has become just an excuse to watch some guy rip himself to shreds with hooks but that's not really a novelty in this genre.
Also, I was surprised in the first movie by how bad Cary Elwes was. I love him from The Princess Bride but he was disappointing here. I laughed through every empassioned moment, which I am sure was not the filmmakers' intent. So I thought the first movie wasn't at all what people were saying about it. It was really just a bleh thriller. I felt the focus on the flashbacks and other stories took away from the more interesting and potentially tense story going on in the bathroom.
The second movie I found much more interesting, with the people in the house and everything. Again, not too much focus on gore, and an obvious improvement in storyline and production values. Although the blond chick annoyed me, what was the point of her being there? They didn't even tell us why this fairly normal looking chick had been in jail! Her only point, and probably why she was cast, was to show everyone how the neurotoxin kills you. Also, too many shots of people coughing up blood, we got the point the first five times. But other than that, a fairly interesting movie.
Then the third one is obviously just a torture porn with a very long boring story about Jigsaw and Amanda that I didn't give a crap about. I actually watched most of that in fast foreward. I liked the concept of the guy in the box but we didn't see enough of it to enjoy enough. And then the killing off of Dina Meyer's character for no reason. Lame.
So I probably won't watch the next three, the road they're going down is not at all interesting.
But my point is that all people wanted to talk about with Saw was how it brought about the era of modern torture porn but not the actual interesting parts in the movies, like the crazy killer who is controlling everything through fear and drugs and psychology, not through being an indestructible maniac.
Also, I was surprised in the first movie by how bad Cary Elwes was. I love him from The Princess Bride but he was disappointing here. I laughed through every empassioned moment, which I am sure was not the filmmakers' intent. So I thought the first movie wasn't at all what people were saying about it. It was really just a bleh thriller. I felt the focus on the flashbacks and other stories took away from the more interesting and potentially tense story going on in the bathroom.
The second movie I found much more interesting, with the people in the house and everything. Again, not too much focus on gore, and an obvious improvement in storyline and production values. Although the blond chick annoyed me, what was the point of her being there? They didn't even tell us why this fairly normal looking chick had been in jail! Her only point, and probably why she was cast, was to show everyone how the neurotoxin kills you. Also, too many shots of people coughing up blood, we got the point the first five times. But other than that, a fairly interesting movie.
Then the third one is obviously just a torture porn with a very long boring story about Jigsaw and Amanda that I didn't give a crap about. I actually watched most of that in fast foreward. I liked the concept of the guy in the box but we didn't see enough of it to enjoy enough. And then the killing off of Dina Meyer's character for no reason. Lame.
So I probably won't watch the next three, the road they're going down is not at all interesting.
But my point is that all people wanted to talk about with Saw was how it brought about the era of modern torture porn but not the actual interesting parts in the movies, like the crazy killer who is controlling everything through fear and drugs and psychology, not through being an indestructible maniac.